Caruso v. Dinkins

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Caruso v. Dinkins

193 A.D.2d 475, 597 N.Y.S.2d 400

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 18, 1993

StatusPublished

This text of 193 A.D.2d 475 (Caruso v. Dinkins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Caruso v. Dinkins, 193 A.D.2d 475, 597 N.Y.S.2d 400 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Martin B. Stecher, J.), entered July 10, 1992, declaring that respondents’ exclusion of the uniform allowance paid to New York City police officers from the pension compensation base used in determining retirement allowances is not contrary to Treasury Department Regulations (26 CFR) § 1.62-2, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Respondents’ determination that the change in Federal withholding tax regulations relating to employee expense allowances that the manner in which police pensions are computed be calculated so as to exclude uniform allowances in the compensation base is not irrational (see, Matter of Caruso v Ward 160 AD2d 557, lv denied 76 NY2d 704). As the IAS Court aptly noted, the uniform allowance has always been subject to taxation if not withholding. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Sullivan, Rosenberger, Ross and Asch, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Martin B. Stecher, J.), entered July 10, 1992, declaring that respondents’ exclusion of the uniform allowance paid to New York City police officers from the pension compensation base used in determining retirement allowances is not contrary to Treasury Department Regulations (26 CFR) § 1.62-2, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Respondents’ determination that the change in Federal withholding tax regulations relating to employee expense allowances that the manner in which police pensions are computed be calculated so as to exclude uniform allowances in the compensation base is not irrational (see, Matter of Caruso v Ward 160 AD2d 557, lv denied 76 NY2d 704). As the IAS Court aptly noted, the uniform allowance has always been subject to taxation if not withholding. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Sullivan, Rosenberger, Ross and Asch, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

193 A.D.2d 475, 597 N.Y.S.2d 400, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/caruso-v-dinkins-nyappdiv-1993.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack