Caruso v. Casciola

261 N.E.2d 907, 27 N.Y.2d 657, 313 N.Y.S.2d 871, 1970 N.Y. LEXIS 1200
New York Court of Appeals·Decided June 16, 1970·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

Order affirmed, without costs, in the following memorandum: Although it is true that several of the signatures herein were improperly validated by Special Term in that the notaries public or commissioners of deeds had not taken oaths of certain signatories (Election Law, § 135, subd. 2; see Matter of Helfand v. Meisser, 22 N Y 2d 762), the remaining valid signatures were far in excess of the amount required for designation. Moreover, although the technical irregularity of failing to administer the oath is sufficient to invalidate a signature, it is not the type of defect which would warrant invalidating the entire petition even though a sufficient number of valid signatures remained (Matter of Clum v. Holmes, 194 Misc. 863).

Concur: Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Burke, Scileppi, Bergan, Breitel, Jasen and Gibson.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Caruso v. Casciola, 261 N.E.2d 907, 27 N.Y.2d 657, 313 N.Y.S.2d 871, 1970 N.Y. LEXIS 1200 (N.Y. 1970).

261 N.E.2d 907 (Caruso v. Casciola) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Matter of Mertz v. Bradshaw
131 A.D.3d 794 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)
Hall v. Dussault
109 A.D.3d 679 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)
O'Dea v. Bell
242 A.D.2d 349 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)
Frazier v. Leon
186 A.D.2d 99 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)
MATTER OF HASKELL v. Gargiulo
411 N.E.2d 778 (New York Court of Appeals, 1980)