Carty v. Brownstein

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Carty v. Brownstein

218 A.D.2d 648, 630 N.Y.S.2d 930, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8270

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedAugust 7, 1995

StatusPublished

This text of 218 A.D.2d 648 (Carty v. Brownstein) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Carty v. Brownstein, 218 A.D.2d 648, 630 N.Y.S.2d 930, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8270 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

—Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 in the nature of mandamus to compel the production of the minutes of the proceedings during jury selection on an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered October 29, 1992.

Motion by the respondent to dismiss the proceeding.

Upon the petition and the papers filed in support of the proceeding and the papers filed in opposition thereto and in support of the motion, it is

Ordered that the motion is granted without prejudice to the petitioner’s making a motion to enlarge the judgment roll to include the minutes of the proceedings during jury selection; and it is further,

Adjudged that the petition is denied and the proceeding is dismissed, without costs or disbursements. Rosenblatt, J. P., Ritter, Copertino and Hart, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 in the nature of mandamus to compel the production of the minutes of the proceedings during jury selection on an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered October 29, 1992.

Motion by the respondent to dismiss the proceeding.

Upon the petition and the papers filed in support of the proceeding and the papers filed in opposition thereto and in support of the motion, it is

Ordered that the motion is granted without prejudice to the petitioner’s making a motion to enlarge the judgment roll to include the minutes of the proceedings during jury selection; and it is further,

Adjudged that the petition is denied and the proceeding is dismissed, without costs or disbursements. Rosenblatt, J. P., Ritter, Copertino and Hart, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

218 A.D.2d 648, 630 N.Y.S.2d 930, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8270, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carty-v-brownstein-nyappdiv-1995.