Cartwright v. City of Birmingham
Opinion
It was shown that the case of the prosecution rested upon evidence obtained by an illegal search of defendant’s house and person — to which due exception was reserved. The judgment would be affirmed on authority of Banks v. State (Ala. App. 5 Div. 375) 93 South. 293; 1 Shields Case, 104 Ala. 35, 16 South. 85, 53 Am. St. Rep. 17; Pope’s Case, 168 Ala. 35, 53 South. 292; Robertson v. City of Montgomery, 201 Ala. 198, 77 South. 724. But there being no assignment of errors in the record, the appeal is dismissed.
Appeal dismissed.
Ante, p. 376.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
93 So. 305 (Cartwright v. City of Birmingham) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.