Cartwright v. City of Birmingham

93 So. 305, 18 Ala. App. 411, 1922 Ala. App. LEXIS 104
Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided January 10, 1922·No. 6 Div. 923.·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

SAMFORD, J.

It was shown that the case of the prosecution rested upon evidence obtained by an illegal search of defendant’s house and person — to which due exception was reserved. The judgment would be affirmed on authority of Banks v. State (Ala. App. 5 Div. 375) 93 South. 293; 1 Shields Case, 104 Ala. 35, 16 South. 85, 53 Am. St. Rep. 17; Pope’s Case, 168 Ala. 35, 53 South. 292; Robertson v. City of Montgomery, 201 Ala. 198, 77 South. 724. But there being no assignment of errors in the record, the appeal is dismissed.

Appeal dismissed.

1

Ante, p. 376.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cartwright v. City of Birmingham, 93 So. 305, 18 Ala. App. 411, 1922 Ala. App. LEXIS 104 (Ala. Ct. App. 1922).

93 So. 305 (Cartwright v. City of Birmingham) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McCormick v. State
112 So. 809 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1927)