Cartwright v. City of Birmingham
This text of 93 So. 305 (Cartwright v. City of Birmingham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
It was shown that the case of the prosecution rested upon evidence obtained by an illegal search of defendant’s house and person — to which due exception was reserved. The judgment would be affirmed on authority of Banks v. State (Ala. App. 5 Div. 375) 93 South. 293; 1 Shields Case, 104 Ala. 35, 16 South. 85, 53 Am. St. Rep. 17; Pope’s Case, 168 Ala. 35, 53 South. 292; Robertson v. City of Montgomery, 201 Ala. 198, 77 South. 724. But there being no assignment of errors in the record, the appeal is dismissed.
Appeal dismissed.
Ante, p. 376.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
93 So. 305, 18 Ala. App. 411, 1922 Ala. App. LEXIS 104, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cartwright-v-city-of-birmingham-alactapp-1922.