Cartright v. State

108 S.E. 70, 27 Ga. App. 258, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 808
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJune 30, 1921
Docket12437
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 108 S.E. 70 (Cartright v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cartright v. State, 108 S.E. 70, 27 Ga. App. 258, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 808 (Ga. Ct. App. 1921).

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

1. The evidence authorized a finding that the offense charged was committed by the defendant in the county of Carroll.

2. The ground of the motion for a new trial, based upon alleged newly discovered evidence, is fatally defective; as ihe newly discovered evidence is that of witnesses, and no affidavits as to their residence, associates, means of knowledge, character, and credibility were adduced. Civil Code (1910), § 6086.

3. The evidence authorized the verdict, and the court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

LeCounte v. State
180 S.E. 657 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1935)
O'Bryant v. State
142 S.E. 306 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1928)
Hewett v. State
137 S.E. 853 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1927)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
108 S.E. 70, 27 Ga. App. 258, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 808, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cartright-v-state-gactapp-1921.