Cartright v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Cartright v. State

108 S.E. 70, 27 Ga. App. 258, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 808

Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided June 30, 1921·No. 12437·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

1. The evidence authorized a finding that the offense charged was committed by the defendant in the county of Carroll.

2. The ground of the motion for a new trial, based upon alleged newly discovered evidence, is fatally defective; as ihe newly discovered evidence is that of witnesses, and no affidavits as to their residence, associates, means of knowledge, character, and credibility were adduced. Civil Code (1910), § 6086.

3. The evidence authorized the verdict, and the court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Broyles, C. J.

1. The evidence authorized a finding that the offense charged was committed by the defendant in the county of Carroll.

2. The ground of the motion for a new trial, based upon alleged newly discovered evidence, is fatally defective; as ihe newly discovered evidence is that of witnesses, and no affidavits as to their residence, associates, means of knowledge, character, and credibility were adduced. Civil Code (1910), § 6086.

3. The evidence authorized the verdict, and the court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.

Cartright v. State, 108 S.E. 70, 27 Ga. App. 258, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 808 (Ga. Ct. App. 1921).

Pincite

108 S.E. 70 (Cartright v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related