Cartledge v. Pierpont Manufacturing Co.

47 S.E. 586, 120 Ga. 221, 1904 Ga. LEXIS 513
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided May 12, 1904·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Simmons, C. J.

It not appearing that the machinery or appliances furnished to the plaintiff were in any way defective, or that the dangers against which it was alleged that the defendant negligently failed to warn him were such that the plaintiff had.no equal means with the defendant of knowing of them, the grant of a nonsuit was not erroneous.

Judgment'affirmed.

All the Justices concur. Charles V. Hohenstein and P. W. Meldrim,iox plaintiff, t O'Connor, O’Bryne & Hartridge and J. B. Anderson, for defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cartledge v. Pierpont Manufacturing Co., 47 S.E. 586, 120 Ga. 221, 1904 Ga. LEXIS 513 (Ga. 1904).

47 S.E. 586 (Cartledge v. Pierpont Manufacturing Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Tufts v. Threlkeld
121 S.E. 120 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1923)
Crown Cotton Mills v. McNally
51 S.E. 13 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1905)