Carter v. Zuber

District Court, W.D. Washington·Decided March 17, 2021·No. 3:20-cv-05166·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA CASE NO. 3:20-cv-05166-RJB-JRC Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING v. SUBMISSION OF SERVICE INFORMATION FOR UNSERVED ASHLEY A. ZUBER, et al., DEFENDANT Defendants. This civil rights matter has been referred to the undersigned Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(A) and (B) and Local Magistrate Judge Rules MJR 1, MJR 3, and MJR 4. See Am. Gen. Order No. 02-19. Plaintiff, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis (“IFP”), initiated this matter on February 24, 2020. See Dkt. 1. On January 25, 2021, the Court directed service of plaintiff’s complaint only as to his claims under the Eighth Amendment. See Dkt. 26; see also Dkts. 22, 25 (dismissing all other claims against defendants). Defendant Zuber has entered an appearance and filed a waiver of service through counsel. See Dkts. 28, 29. However, defendant “S. Roddey” has made no appearance in this matter. Defendant Zuber’s counsel has filed a notice stating that the Department of Corrections has been unable to identify any employee named S. Roddey and that no other individual by this name has been located or identified as a State of Washington employee. See Dkt. 30. As a result, defendant Roddey has not been served in this matter and is

not subject to the Court’s jurisdiction. Although the Court has directed service of the summons and complaint, plaintiff still bears the burden of providing accurate and sufficient information to effect service. See Walker v. Sumner, 14 F.3d 1415, 1422 (9th Cir. 1994), overruled on other grounds by Sandin v. Conner, 515 U.S. 472 (1995); see also Fed. R. Civ. P. 4. When an IFP plaintiff fails to provide the Court with accurate and sufficient information to effect service of the summons and complaint, it is appropriate for the Court to sua sponte dismiss the unserved defendant. See Walker, 14 F.3d at 1421–22. Accordingly, plaintiff is directed to provide the complete name, address, and any other identifying information for defendant Roddey so that the Court can effect service. This

information must be provided to the Court on or before Friday, April 16, 2021, or the Court may recommend dismissal of defendant Roddey from this action without prejudice. Dated this 17th day of March, 2021.

A J. Richard Creatura United States Magistrate Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Carter v. Zuber, (W.D. Wash. 2021).

Carter v. Zuber (Carter v. Zuber) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related