Carter v. Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc.

M.D. Florida

Carter v. Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc.

DecidedNovember 23, 2021

Docket5:21-cv-00152

StatusUnknown

This text of Carter v. Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc. (Carter v. Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, M.D. Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Carter v. Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc., (M.D. Fla. 2021).

Pincite

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA OCALA DIVISION

PAMBELA CARTER, individually

Plaintiff,

v. Case No: 5:21-cv-152-JSM-PRL

LARRY CLARK,

Defendant.

ORDER Previously, the Court entered an Order to show cause directing Plaintiff to respond regarding whether his motion for Clerk’s default should be granted. Plaintiff has responded and asserts that, despite his diligent attempts to obtain service, Defendant Larry Clark is concealing his whereabouts and that Plaintiff was required to obtain service through the Secretary of State pursuant to Florida Statute § 48.161. (Doc. 31). In certain circumstances, substitute service of process may be effected under Florida law upon either a nonresident or a party who conceals his or her whereabouts. The method relied upon by Plaintiff here for effecting substitute process is outlined in Florida Statute § 48.161. Section 48.161 requires substituted service be evidenced by: (1) registered or certified mailing to the nonresident of (a) a notice of such substituted service and (b) a copy of the process, which must be evidenced by (c) the filing of the nonresident’s return receipt and (d) an affidavit of compliance by plaintiff or his or her attorney; or (2) an appropriate officer’s return showing service on the nonresident within or without the state of Florida. § 48.161, Fla. Stat. (2013); Conde v. Prof'l Mediquip of Fla., Inc., 436 So.2d 322, 323 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983). Through representations of counsel Jason Tenenbaum, Plaintiff attests that he sent notice to the Defendant, via certified or registered mail, that substitute service has been effected through the Secretary of State, that he filed the return receipt from the defendant, and that he filed an affidavit of compliance. (Doc. 31). Accordingly, Plaintiffs motion for Clerk’s Default (Doc. 27) is due to be granted. DONE and ORDERED in Ocala, Florida on November 23, 2021.

best 2 PHILIP R. LAMMENS United States Magistrate Judge Copies furnished to: Counsel of Record Unrepresented Parties

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA OCALA DIVISION

PAMBELA CARTER, individually

Plaintiff,

v. Case No: 5:21-cv-152-JSM-PRL

LARRY CLARK,

Defendant.

ORDER Previously, the Court entered an Order to show cause directing Plaintiff to respond regarding whether his motion for Clerk’s default should be granted. Plaintiff has responded and asserts that, despite his diligent attempts to obtain service, Defendant Larry Clark is concealing his whereabouts and that Plaintiff was required to obtain service through the Secretary of State pursuant to Florida Statute § 48.161. (Doc. 31). In certain circumstances, substitute service of process may be effected under Florida law upon either a nonresident or a party who conceals his or her whereabouts. The method relied upon by Plaintiff here for effecting substitute process is outlined in Florida Statute § 48.161. Section 48.161 requires substituted service be evidenced by: (1) registered or certified mailing to the nonresident of (a) a notice of such substituted service and (b) a copy of the process, which must be evidenced by (c) the filing of the nonresident’s return receipt and (d) an affidavit of compliance by plaintiff or his or her attorney; or (2) an appropriate officer’s return showing service on the nonresident within or without the state of Florida. § 48.161, Fla. Stat. (2013); Conde v. Prof'l Mediquip of Fla., Inc., 436 So.2d 322, 323 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983). Through representations of counsel Jason Tenenbaum, Plaintiff attests that he sent notice to the Defendant, via certified or registered mail, that substitute service has been effected through the Secretary of State, that he filed the return receipt from the defendant, and that he filed an affidavit of compliance. (Doc. 31). Accordingly, Plaintiffs motion for Clerk’s Default (Doc. 27) is due to be granted. DONE and ORDERED in Ocala, Florida on November 23, 2021.

best 2 PHILIP R. LAMMENS United States Magistrate Judge Copies furnished to: Counsel of Record Unrepresented Parties

-2-

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Carter v. Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carter-v-winn-dixie-stores-inc-flmd-2021.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack