Carter v. White

32 Ill. 509
Illinois Supreme Court·Decided November 15, 1863·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Mr. Justice Breese

delivered the opinion of the Court:

The action of assumpsit, so called, is an action on the case, and is properly entitled an action of trespass on the case. To determine the cause of action, whether for a tort or on promises, we must look to the declaration. The first and second counts are very in artificially drawn, to say the least, and are meaningless. The third, fourth and fifth counts are counts in assumpsit.

The judgment is correctly entered against all the defendants, as appears by the amended record filed.

As there are no facts preserved by the bill of exceptions, we cannot determine whether the court, sitting as a jury, found correctly or not. We must intend the court had sufficient evidence before it to justify its finding, and we must affirm the judgment.

' Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Carter v. White, 32 Ill. 509 (Ill. 1863).

32 Ill. 509 (Carter v. White) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Roe v. County of Cook
193 N.E. 472 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1934)
Derk P. Yonkerman Co. v. Charles H. Fuller's Advertising Agency
135 F. 613 (U.S. Circuit Court for the Northern District of Illnois, 1905)
Durham v. Stubbings
111 Ill. App. 10 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1903)
Illinois Steel Co. v. Eylenfeldt
62 Ill. App. 552 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1896)
Sherburne v. Tobey Furniture Co.
19 Ill. App. 615 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1886)
Willenborg v. Illinois Central Railroad
11 Ill. App. 298 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1882)