Carter v. Washington

Virginia Chancery Court

Carter v. Washington

1 Va. 203

Virginia Chancery Court·Decided March 16, 1806·Published

Opinion

The complainant obtained an injunction, in this Court, to stay waste. After the answer of the defendants had come in, and the cause was set down for hearing, the complainant died.

Botts, for the defendants, stated that the representatives of the complainant were numerous, much dispersed, and not .well known ; and that it would be difficult, if not ’^impossible, to trace their persons, rights, or residence, so as to serve any order of Court upon them. He therefore moved that an order might be entered, that, unless the representatives of the complainant should come in, before the end of the next term, and cause the suit to be revived in their names, the injunction to stay waste should stand dissolved,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The complainant obtained an injunction, in this Court, to stay waste. After the answer of the defendants had come in, and the cause was set down for hearing, the complainant died.

Botts, for the defendants, stated that the representatives of the complainant were numerous, much dispersed, and not .well known ; and that it would be difficult, if not ’^impossible, to trace their persons, rights, or residence, so as to serve any order of Court upon them. He therefore moved that an order might be entered, that, unless the representatives of the complainant should come in, before the end of the next term, and cause the suit to be revived in their names, the injunction to stay waste should stand dissolved,

Carter v. Washington, 1 Va. 203 (Va. Super. Ct. 1806).

Pincite

1 Va. 203 (Carter v. Washington) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.