Carter v. Warden of Maryland House of Correction
This text of 140 A.2d 647 (Carter v. Warden of Maryland House of Correction) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We have repeatedly held that each of the contentions raised by the appellant is not available as a basis for the issuance of a writ of habeas corpus: (1) that he was refused the right to a separate trial, Shields v. Warden, 212 Md. 655, 656; (2) that the charge of arson was not proven at his trial, Johnson v. Warden, 212 Md. 652, 653; (3) that postponement of his trial was refused, Lawrenson v. Warden, 212 Md. 664, 666; and (4) that the court refused to allow character witnesses to testify, Davis v. Warden, 208 Md. 675.
Application denied, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
140 A.2d 647, 216 Md. 654, 1958 Md. LEXIS 487, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carter-v-warden-of-maryland-house-of-correction-md-1958.