Carter v. Valentine

436 S.E.2d 225, 263 Ga. 465
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedOctober 25, 1993
DocketS93A1360
StatusPublished

This text of 436 S.E.2d 225 (Carter v. Valentine) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Carter v. Valentine, 436 S.E.2d 225, 263 Ga. 465 (Ga. 1993).

Opinion

Hunt, Presiding Justice.

This is an appeal from the trial court’s order granting injunctive relief in a partnership dispute between two dentists. Although the order is styled a permanent injunction, we view that order as a preliminary one, continuing the previously entered “Order for Interlocutory Injunction” in this case. It appears that both orders are intended to maintain the status quo pending a final disposition of any remaining claims.1 No manifest abuse of discretion has been shown, nor is any apparent. Accordingly, we affirm. Mark Smith Constr. Co. v. Fulton County, 248 Ga. 694, 695 (2) (285 SE2d 692) (1982).

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur. Schreeder, Wheeler & Flint, David Flint, for appellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

MARK SMITH CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC. v. Fulton County
285 S.E.2d 692 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
436 S.E.2d 225, 263 Ga. 465, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carter-v-valentine-ga-1993.