Carter v. U.S. Dist. Court for Dist. of Maryland

23 F.3d 399, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 18440, 1994 WL 191732
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedMay 17, 1994
Docket94-1310
StatusPublished

This text of 23 F.3d 399 (Carter v. U.S. Dist. Court for Dist. of Maryland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Carter v. U.S. Dist. Court for Dist. of Maryland, 23 F.3d 399, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 18440, 1994 WL 191732 (4th Cir. 1994).

Opinion

23 F.3d 399
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Charles E. CARTER, Plaintiff Appellant,
and
Charles H. Carter; Alysia Carter, Plaintiffs,
v.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT for the DISTRICT OF MARYLAND;
J. Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General; Julia M. Freit,
Assistant Attorney General; William O. Carr; Cypert O.
Whitfill, Defendants Appellees.

No. 94-1310.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted April 21, 1994.
Decided May 17, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore, John R. Hargrove, District Judge. (CA-93-4117-HAR)

Charles E. Carter, appellant pro se.

D.Md.

AFFIRMED.

Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, MICHAEL, Circuit Judge, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Carter v. United States District Court, No. CA-93-4117-HAR (D. Md. Feb. 1, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
23 F.3d 399, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 18440, 1994 WL 191732, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carter-v-us-dist-court-for-dist-of-maryland-ca4-1994.