Carter v. Traudt

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Carter v. Traudt

552 A.2d 1189, 1989 R.I. LEXIS 13, 1989 WL 8722

CourtSupreme Court of Rhode Island

DecidedFebruary 3, 1989

DocketNo. 89-40-M.P.

StatusPublished

This text of 552 A.2d 1189 (Carter v. Traudt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Rhode Island primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Carter v. Traudt, 552 A.2d 1189, 1989 R.I. LEXIS 13, 1989 WL 8722 (R.I. 1989).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

The disciplinary counsel has brought before the court miscellaneous petitions regarding two complaints pending against the respondent attorney, Terrence Traudt. Accompanying the petitions was an affidavit of the respondent attorney consenting to disbarment under the provisions of Rule 42-13(b) of the Supreme Court Disciplinary Rules.

It is the court’s opinion at this time that the consent to disbarment should be taken under advisement and held in abeyance for the present. The Disciplinary Board is directed to continue the hearings being conducted on this matter and to prepare findings of fact and render decisions for consideration of the court.

In view of the information contained in the affidavit submitted, the respondent attorney is suspended from the practice of law until further order of this court. This suspension is effective immediately.

KE3LLEHER, J., did not participate.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The disciplinary counsel has brought before the court miscellaneous petitions regarding two complaints pending against the respondent attorney, Terrence Traudt. Accompanying the petitions was an affidavit of the respondent attorney consenting to disbarment under the provisions of Rule 42-13(b) of the Supreme Court Disciplinary Rules.

It is the court’s opinion at this time that the consent to disbarment should be taken under advisement and held in abeyance for the present. The Disciplinary Board is directed to continue the hearings being conducted on this matter and to prepare findings of fact and render decisions for consideration of the court.

In view of the information contained in the affidavit submitted, the respondent attorney is suspended from the practice of law until further order of this court. This suspension is effective immediately.

KE3LLEHER, J., did not participate.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

552 A.2d 1189, 1989 R.I. LEXIS 13, 1989 WL 8722, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carter-v-traudt-ri-1989.