Carter v. The Mascotte
51 F. 605, 2 C.C.A. 399, 1892 U.S. App. LEXIS 1313
Opinion
We agree with the learned district judge who decided this cause in the court below, that the libelants have a sufficient ease for the recovery of their damages, by reason of nondelivery of their cargo in good order and condition. The burden of proof is on the steamship to overcome the effect of the acknowledgment in the bill of lading of the reception of the goods on board “ in good order and condition,” and the evidence introduced on her behalf is not sufficient to overcome the effect of this recital. The decree is affirmed'.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Carter v. The Mascotte, 51 F. 605, 2 C.C.A. 399, 1892 U.S. App. LEXIS 1313 (2d Cir. 1892).
51 F. 605 (Carter v. The Mascotte) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Bingham v. Osaka Shosen Kaisha
12 F. Supp. 35 (S.D. New York, 1935)
The Warren
40 F.2d 700 (W.D. Washington, 1930)
Pacific Coast S. S. Co. v. Bancroft-Whitney Co.
94 F. 180 (Ninth Circuit, 1899)
The Lennox
90 F. 308 (S.D. New York, 1898)
The Phoenicia
90 F. 116 (S.D. New York, 1898)
Bancroft-Whitney Co. v. The Queen
78 F. 155 (N.D. California, 1896)
Bancroft-Whitney Co. v. The Queen of the Pacific
75 F. 74 (N.D. California, 1896)
Bregaro v. The Centurion
57 F. 412 (S.D. New York, 1893)