Home/Second Circuit/Carter v. The Mascotte

Carter v. The Mascotte

51 F. 605, 2 C.C.A. 399, 1892 U.S. App. LEXIS 1313
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit
DecidedJuly 20, 1892
DocketNo. 76
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 51 F. 605 (Carter v. The Mascotte) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Carter v. The Mascotte, 51 F. 605, 2 C.C.A. 399, 1892 U.S. App. LEXIS 1313 (2d Cir. 1892).

Opinion

Wallace, Circuit Judge.

We agree with the learned district judge who decided this cause in the court below, that the libelants have a sufficient ease for the recovery of their damages, by reason of nondelivery of their cargo in good order and condition. The burden of proof is on the steamship to overcome the effect of the acknowledgment in the bill of lading of the reception of the goods on board “ in good order and condition,” and the evidence introduced on her behalf is not sufficient to overcome the effect of this recital. The decree is affirmed'.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bingham v. Osaka Shosen Kaisha
12 F. Supp. 35 (S.D. New York, 1935)
The Warren
40 F.2d 700 (W.D. Washington, 1930)
Pacific Coast S. S. Co. v. Bancroft-Whitney Co.
94 F. 180 (Ninth Circuit, 1899)
The Lennox
90 F. 308 (S.D. New York, 1898)
The Phoenicia
90 F. 116 (S.D. New York, 1898)
Bancroft-Whitney Co. v. The Queen
78 F. 155 (N.D. California, 1896)
Bancroft-Whitney Co. v. The Queen of the Pacific
75 F. 74 (N.D. California, 1896)
Bregaro v. The Centurion
57 F. 412 (S.D. New York, 1893)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
51 F. 605, 2 C.C.A. 399, 1892 U.S. App. LEXIS 1313, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carter-v-the-mascotte-ca2-1892.