Carter v. Terminix

281 S.W.3d 925, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 569, 2009 WL 1120781
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided April 28, 2009·No. ED 92066·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Clarence Carter appeals the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission’s decision in favor of Terminix finding that Carter was not entitled to recover under Missouri Workers Compensation Law for injuries resulting from an automobile accident. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties *926 and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Carter v. Terminix, 281 S.W.3d 925, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 569, 2009 WL 1120781 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

281 S.W.3d 925 (Carter v. Terminix) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. LUGOSCAMPOS
281 S.W.3d 925 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2009)