Carter v. Tarantelli

259 A.D. 1068, 22 N.Y.S.2d 263, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8000
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 28, 1940
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 259 A.D. 1068 (Carter v. Tarantelli) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Carter v. Tarantelli, 259 A.D. 1068, 22 N.Y.S.2d 263, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8000 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1940).

Opinion

Order reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs, on the ground that the second count of the complaint fails to state a cause of action beyond that alleged in the first cause of action. (See Brewster v. Rogers Co., 169 N. Y. 73, 80 ; 30 Fed. Cases, 999, 1000, Case No. 18,258.) All concur. (The order denies defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint as to the second cause of action. The first cause of action is to recover a penalty for the refusal of defendants to serve plaintiff in a public restaurant because plaintiff was colored. The second cause of action is for damages sustained by plaintiff by reason of her being compelled to leave the restaurant without service.) Present — Crosby, P. J., Cunningham, Taylor, Dowling and McCurn, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Heuman v. Panhellenic House Ass'n
179 Misc. 736 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1943)
Odom v. East Avenue Corp.
178 Misc. 363 (New York Supreme Court, 1942)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
259 A.D. 1068, 22 N.Y.S.2d 263, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8000, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carter-v-tarantelli-nyappdiv-1940.