Carter v. Tarantelli
This text of 259 A.D. 1068 (Carter v. Tarantelli) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs, on the ground that the second count of the complaint fails to state a cause of action beyond that alleged in the first cause of action. (See Brewster v. Rogers Co., 169 N. Y. 73, 80 ; 30 Fed. Cases, 999, 1000, Case No. 18,258.) All concur. (The order denies defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint as to the second cause of action. The first cause of action is to recover a penalty for the refusal of defendants to serve plaintiff in a public restaurant because plaintiff was colored. The second cause of action is for damages sustained by plaintiff by reason of her being compelled to leave the restaurant without service.) Present — Crosby, P. J., Cunningham, Taylor, Dowling and McCurn, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
259 A.D. 1068, 22 N.Y.S.2d 263, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8000, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carter-v-tarantelli-nyappdiv-1940.