Carter v. Tarantelli

259 A.D. 1068, 22 N.Y.S.2d 263, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8000
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 28, 1940·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Order reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs, on the ground that the second count of the complaint fails to state a cause of action beyond that alleged in the first cause of action. (See Brewster v. Rogers Co., 169 N. Y. 73, 80 ; 30 Fed. Cases, 999, 1000, Case No. 18,258.) All concur. (The order denies defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint as to the second cause of action. The first cause of action is to recover a penalty for the refusal of defendants to serve plaintiff in a public restaurant because plaintiff was colored. The second cause of action is for damages sustained by plaintiff by reason of her being compelled to leave the restaurant without service.) Present — Crosby, P. J., Cunningham, Taylor, Dowling and McCurn, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Carter v. Tarantelli, 259 A.D. 1068, 22 N.Y.S.2d 263, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8000 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1940).

259 A.D. 1068 (Carter v. Tarantelli) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Heuman v. Panhellenic House Ass'n
179 Misc. 736 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1943)
Odom v. East Avenue Corp.
178 Misc. 363 (New York Supreme Court, 1942)