Carter v. Studdard

79 So. 225, 118 Miss. 345
CourtMississippi Supreme Court
DecidedMarch 15, 1918
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 79 So. 225 (Carter v. Studdard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Carter v. Studdard, 79 So. 225, 118 Miss. 345 (Mich. 1918).

Opinion

Ethridge, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

Appellant, Carter, and defendants Studdard and White on the 29th day of May, 1914, entered into the following contract:

“(1) This agreement, made and entered into by and between John B. Studdard, H. A. White, and William 0. White, of Memphis, Tennessee, parties of the first part, or their assigns, and M. S. Carter, of Fulton, Tennessee, party of the second part.

“(2) The said parties of the first part are the owners of a certain tract of timber located in township 17, range 5 east, Warren county, Mississippi, being a total acreage of one thousand three hundred and seventy, bought from the Dabney estate and Walton (see records for description), witnesseth:

“(3) The said second party is the owner of a sawmill now located at Fulton, Tennessee, and hereby agrees to move said mill to Mississippi, locating same on the above-described tract of timber, at his own expense, making two sets, one on the east and one’ on the west side of tract, at his expense.

“ (4) The said first parties hereby agree to deliver the logs on the yard skidway at their own expense, and the said second party agrees to saw into lumber the logs from 12" in diameter and up, manufacturing same into the best widths and standard thicknesses, as may be [347]*347directed by said first parties, and sawing the best grades of lumber possible out of each log, trimming the rough ends, and manufacturing the lumber with as little loss as possible, having in view at all times the saving of timber and the manufacturing of the highest grades of lumber.

“(5) And for the cutting of said timber into lumber, the first parties agree to pay at the rate of five dollars per thousand feet for the oak, poplar, cottonwood, and lynn, and five dollars and fifty cents per thousand for the hickory, lumber measurements, hut no lumber under No. 2 common is to be paid for only as hereinafter provided for.

“(6) Settlements for the cutting are to- be made on an estimate of the amount of lumber cut and stacked at the end of every two weeks, less five (5) per cent., and the final settlement for the manufacturing of the lumber is to be based and made by the tally sheets from the sale of the lumber.

“ (7) After deducting the cost of manufacturing, selling, and loading on cars, collection for the lumber, and the adding to this cost stumpage value as follows: five dollars per thousand feet for the oak and poplar, and six dollars for the hickory lumber, for all grades except No. 2 common which shall be charged stumpage value at the rate of two dollars per thousand feet, the cottonwood and lynn at three dollars and fifty cents per thousand for all grades except No. 2 common, Which shall be two dollars per thousand feet as stump-age value, which shall be retained by the said first parties — -it is agreed by the said first parties that whatever amount, if any, may be received from the sale of the lumber, over and above all expenses, including stumpage value as above set out, that the said first parties are to retain two-thirds of the excess, and to pay to said second party the other one-third, such excess to be paid to him for his services rendered in the scaling of logs, loading cars, measuring of lum.[348]*348her, looking after the interest of the first parties in a most profitable manner.

“(8) The said second party hereby agrees to render such services and to accept the one-third excess for his services rendered as above stated.

“ (9) The said second party agrees to furnish sticks and foundation and to stack the lumber at a price not to exceed fifty cents per thousand feet, using plenty of sticks in stacking, widths not to be over lVz inches, clear of bark edges, and to construct the foundation with the proper slant, using enough sills to prevent lumber from sagging in the stacks and no lumber to be stacked within two hundred feet of the mill shed.

£(10) The said second party further agrees to keep the lumber cleaned up from the yard and put into stacks promptly, in order that the lumber may not damage from the weather or being in the bulk on the yard.

££(11) The said second party agrees to make weekly reports by mail to said first parties, giving approximately the amount, kinds, and grades of lumber that he has manufactured at the end of the week; also scale on log's hauled by the logger.

££(12) The said second party is to scale logs and keep close watch over the cutting, hauling, and not to allow such timber to be cut and hauled that will not produce good lumber; also to look after the loading and measurements of lumber and to keep account of the lumber hauled from the mill to railroad, crediting each man with the amount he has hauled, furnished the name and amount hauled by each individual to the said first parties.

££(13) The said second party agrees to saw any lumber from any additional timber that the said first parties may purchase from time to time at the same prices and conditions as heretofore mentioned.

££ (14) The said second party agrees not to negotiate for or to purchase from any one any timber, either standing or in logs, from parties during the [349]*349time he is employed by the said first parties to eat the timber from these one thousand three hundred and seventy acres, or any additional timber the said first parties may purchase on adjoining land. It is understood that, where timber is offered to the said second party by owners, he is first to submit such offers to the said first parties, and if purchase is made by the said second party it must be made by the direction of the said first party.

“(15) It is agreed and understood by the parties hereto that if for any reason the said first parties fail to keep enough logs on skidways or yard, and the said second party was compelled to close down his mill for any reasonable time, that in this event the said second party would not be entitled to any pay for the loss of time. It is further agreed, in case the lumber market should become dull and the said first parties could not dispose of their lumber without a loss, the said second party shall close down his mill without any expense to the said first parties until such conditions shall have improved, to enable the said first parties to sell their lumber without a loss.

“(16) The said second party is to- sell for cash to the local trade such lumber as mill culls at the best price obtainable, reporting the amount and turning over all proceeds from such sale promply to said first parties.

“(17) The said first parties agree to pay to said second party - per cent, of the total amount collected from the sale of the mill culls; said amounts to be credited to the account of said second party and to be paid at the final settlement.

“(18) It is agreed to and understood between the parties to this contract that, in the event that said second party should die or become disabled before completing this contract, the said first party shall have the right to take charge and operate his mill outfit, paying to his estate one dollar per thousand feet rental [350]*350for all lumber cut on his mill, until they shall have finished cutting all the timber they own or have under contract to purchase.

“Witness our signature this 29th day of May, 1914. • .

“John E. Studdaed,

“N. A. White,

“Wm. 0. White by H. A. White.

“M. S. Carter.”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Mitchell v. Rawls
493 So. 2d 361 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1986)
Partee v. Pepple
20 So. 2d 73 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1944)
Lomel Realty Corp. v. Chopin
148 So. 683 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1933)
City of Allegan v. Vonasek
245 N.W. 557 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1932)
Hays v. Federal Land Bank
140 So. 517 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1932)
J. H. Leavenworth & Son, Inc. v. Hunter
116 So. 593 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1928)
Studdard v. Carter
82 So. 70 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1919)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
79 So. 225, 118 Miss. 345, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carter-v-studdard-miss-1918.