Carter v. STEVENS TRANSPORT, INC.

225 S.W.3d 607, 2006 Tex. App. LEXIS 5851, 2006 WL 1868331
Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided July 6, 2006·No. 08-06-00132-CV·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

OPINION

DAVID WELLINGTON CHEW, Justice.

This appeal arises from a breach of contract action filed by Appellant Johnnie Lee Carter against Appellee Stevens Transport, Inc. During the pendency of the underlying action, Appellant filed a notice of intent to orally depose Appellee. In response, Appellee moved to quash Appellant’s notice of intent to depose. The trial court granted Appellee’s motion and Appellant appealed the trial court’s ruling. While his appeal was pending, Appellant non-suited the underlying case.

Pending before the Court is Appellee’s motion to dismiss this appeal pursuant to Tex.R.App.P. 42.3. When the judgment of this Court can have no effect on an existing controversy, a case becomes moot. Restrepo v. First National Bank of Dona Ana County, New Mexico, 888 S.W.2d 606, *608 607 (Tex.App.-El Paso 1994, no writ). Because Appellant has taken a non-suit in the trial court, a judgment of this Court can have no effect on an existing controversy, because there is no longer any controversy. See Restrepo, 888 S.W.2d at 607. Thus, Appellant’s case has become moot. See id. Accordingly, we grant Appellee’s motion and dismiss the appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Carter v. STEVENS TRANSPORT, INC., 225 S.W.3d 607, 2006 Tex. App. LEXIS 5851, 2006 WL 1868331 (Tex. Ct. App. 2006).

225 S.W.3d 607 (Carter v. STEVENS TRANSPORT, INC.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

CTL/Thompson Texas, LLC v. Starwood Homeowner's Ass'n
352 S.W.3d 854 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2011)
Jerold Klug v. John Restivo and Cathy Restivo
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2009