Carter v. Steigelman

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Carter v. Steigelman

140 A. 924, 6 N.J. Misc. 167, 1928 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 441

DecidedJanuary 5, 1928

StatusPublished

This text of 140 A. 924 (Carter v. Steigelman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Carter v. Steigelman, 140 A. 924, 6 N.J. Misc. 167, 1928 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 441 (N.J. 1928).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

These two actions were tried together and resulted in verdiets in favor of the defendant.

Damages were sought for personal injuries sustained hy the plaintiffs through being struck by defendant’s automobile while the plaintiffs were crossing Zabriskie street, at or near Central avenue, in Jersey City.

It is urged that these verdicts should be set aside as being against the weight of evidence.

We conclude that they are not, and the rule to show cause is therefore discharged, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

These two actions were tried together and resulted in verdiets in favor of the defendant.

Damages were sought for personal injuries sustained hy the plaintiffs through being struck by defendant’s automobile while the plaintiffs were crossing Zabriskie street, at or near Central avenue, in Jersey City.

It is urged that these verdicts should be set aside as being against the weight of evidence.

We conclude that they are not, and the rule to show cause is therefore discharged, with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

140 A. 924, 6 N.J. Misc. 167, 1928 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 441, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carter-v-steigelman-nj-1928.