Carter v. State of Virginia

Fourth Circuit

Carter v. State of Virginia

46 F. App'x 714

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided September 27, 2002·No. Nos. 02-1836, 02-1839·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Kenneth O. Carter seeks to appeal the district court’s orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (West Supp.2001) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeals on the reasoning of the district court. See Carter v. State of Virginia, No. CA-02-18-4 (E.D.Va. July 25, 2002); Carter v. Goldberg, No. CA-02-17 [715] (E.D.Va. July 25, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Kenneth O. Carter seeks to appeal the district court’s orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (West Supp.2001) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeals on the reasoning of the district court. See Carter v. State of Virginia, No. CA-02-18-4 (E.D.Va. July 25, 2002); Carter v. Goldberg, No. CA-02-17 [715] (E.D.Va. July 25, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Carter v. State of Virginia, 46 F. App'x 714 (4th Cir. 2002).

Pincite

46 F. App'x 714 (Carter v. State of Virginia) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related