Carter v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Carter v. State

565 S.W.3d 760

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJanuary 15, 2019

DocketNo. ED 106103

StatusPublished

This text of 565 S.W.3d 760 (Carter v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Carter v. State, 565 S.W.3d 760 (Mo. Ct. App. 2019).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Zachary Carter ("Movant") appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035¹ motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we conclude the motion court did not clearly err in denying Movant's Rule 24.035 motion. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

Zachary Carter ("Movant") appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035¹ motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we conclude the motion court did not clearly err in denying Movant's Rule 24.035 motion. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

565 S.W.3d 760, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carter-v-state-moctapp-2019.