Carter v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Carter v. State

565 S.W.3d 760

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Carter v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 540 S.W.3d 506 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided January 15, 2019·No. No. ED 106103·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Zachary Carter ("Movant") appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035¹ motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we conclude the motion court did not clearly err in denying Movant's Rule 24.035 motion. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

Zachary Carter ("Movant") appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035¹ motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we conclude the motion court did not clearly err in denying Movant's Rule 24.035 motion. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Carter v. State, 565 S.W.3d 760 (Mo. Ct. App. 2019).

Pincite

565 S.W.3d 760 (Carter v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.