Carter v. State
272 S.W.3d 471, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1688, 2008 WL 5470430
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Carter v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1943 →
Opinion
ORDER
Christopher D. Carter (“Movant”) appeals the motion court’s denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. The sole claim raised by Movant would require this court to violate our standard of review by substituting our judgment of witness credibility for that of the motion court; something we cannot do.
*472 The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Carter v. State, 272 S.W.3d 471, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1688, 2008 WL 5470430 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).
272 S.W.3d 471 (Carter v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.