Carter v. State

176 S.E. 813, 50 Ga. App. 16, 1934 Ga. App. LEXIS 599
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided October 16, 1934·No. 24186·Published

Opinion

Broyles, O. J.

1. A charge to the jury that “The accused is required to establish an alibi only to the satisfaction of the jury, and the evidence of alibi must be considered with the other testimony in the case,” did not place too great a burden upon the accused by requiring him to establish his defense of an alibi “only to the satisfaction of the jury.” It would have been more accurate to put the word “reasonable” before the word “satisfaction,” but that error or omission does not require a reversal of the judgment. Dedge v. State, 153 Ga. 176 (111 S. E. 547).

2. The complaint of the foregoing charge is the only assignment of error insisted upon in the brief of counsel for the plaintiff in error; and, that assignment being without merit, the judgment of the superior court refusing to sanction the petition for certiorari must be and is

Affb-med.

MacIntyre and Guerry, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Carter v. State, 176 S.E. 813, 50 Ga. App. 16, 1934 Ga. App. LEXIS 599 (Ga. Ct. App. 1934).

176 S.E. 813 (Carter v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Dedge v. State
111 S.E. 547 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1922)