Carter v. State
129 S.E. 798, 34 Ga. App. 581, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 426
Opinion
1. The' excerpt from the charge of the court, complained of in the 1st ground of the amendment to the motion for a new trial, clearly intimated that a crime had been committed. This was reversible error. Phillips v. State, 131 Ga. 426 (62 S. E. 239); Green v. State, 7 Ga. App. 803 (68 S. E. 318).
2. The relationship of the jurors to the prosecutor was not definitely established, and the affidavits of the supporting witnesses were defective in that the names of the affiants’ associates were not given.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Carter v. State, 129 S.E. 798, 34 Ga. App. 581, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 426 (Ga. Ct. App. 1925).
129 S.E. 798 (Carter v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Yeargin v. State
298 S.E.2d 606 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1982)
Bowen v. State
162 S.E. 151 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1932)
Tyre v. State
134 S.E. 178 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1926)