Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Carter v. State

Carter v. State

866 So. 2d 772, 2004 WL 360892
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 25, 2004·No. 3D03-2699·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

866 So.2d 772 (2004)

Joseph CARTER, Appellant,
v.
The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D03-2699.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

February 25, 2004.

Joseph Carter, Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, and Jill K. Traina, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before GODERICH, GREEN, and WELLS, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The defendant appeals an order denying as untimely his rule 3.853 motion for postconviction DNA testing. In light of the State's concession that the motion was timely filed, we reverse and remand for further consideration on the merits.

We affirm the denial of his rule 3.800(a) motion to correct an illegal sentence.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Carter v. State, 866 So. 2d 772, 2004 WL 360892 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

866 So. 2d 772 (Carter v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Carter v. State
2 So. 3d 320 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)