Carter v. State

866 So. 2d 772, 2004 WL 360892
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 25, 2004
Docket3D03-2699
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 866 So. 2d 772 (Carter v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Carter v. State, 866 So. 2d 772, 2004 WL 360892 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

Opinion

866 So.2d 772 (2004)

Joseph CARTER, Appellant,
v.
The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D03-2699.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

February 25, 2004.

Joseph Carter, Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, and Jill K. Traina, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before GODERICH, GREEN, and WELLS, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The defendant appeals an order denying as untimely his rule 3.853 motion for postconviction DNA testing. In light of the State's concession that the motion was timely filed, we reverse and remand for further consideration on the merits.

We affirm the denial of his rule 3.800(a) motion to correct an illegal sentence.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Carter v. State
2 So. 3d 320 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
866 So. 2d 772, 2004 WL 360892, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carter-v-state-fladistctapp-2004.