Carter v. State
787 So. 2d 34, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 1325, 2001 WL 120361
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Carter v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 710 So. 2d 110 →
Opinion
Charles Carter, III, appeals the summary denial of his motion to correct illegal sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a), alleging that he is entitled to be resentenced under the supreme court’s decision in Heggs v. State, 759 So.2d 620 (Fla.2000). We affirm without prejudice to any right Carter might have to file a rule 3.850 motion challenging the voluntary and intelligent nature of his plea pursuant to Murphy v. State, 773 So.2d 1174 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Carter v. State, 787 So. 2d 34, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 1325, 2001 WL 120361 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).
787 So. 2d 34 (Carter v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Murphy v. State
773 So. 2d 1174 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)
Heggs v. State
759 So. 2d 620 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2000)