Carter v. State

331 So. 2d 293, 1976 Fla. LEXIS 4308
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided April 21, 1976·No. No. 46692·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

The Petition for Writ of Certiorari reflected probable jurisdiction in this Court. We issued the Writ and have heard argument of the parties. After hearing argument and upon further consideration of the matter, we have determined that the Court is without jurisdiction. Therefore, the Writ must be and is hereby discharged and the Petition for Writ of Certiorari is dismissed.

It is so ordered.

OVERTON, C. J., and ROBERTS, SUNDBERG and HATCHETT, JJ., concur. ENGLAND, J., concurs specially with an opinion. BOYD, J., dissents with an opinion. ADKINS, J., dissents and concurs with BOYD, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Carter v. State, 331 So. 2d 293, 1976 Fla. LEXIS 4308 (Fla. 1976).

331 So. 2d 293 (Carter v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Florida Greyhound, Etc. v. West Flagler Assoc.
347 So. 2d 408 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1977)
Shevin v. Cenville Communities, Inc.
338 So. 2d 1281 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1976)