Carter v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Carter v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.

964 So. 2d 375, 2007 La. LEXIS 2221

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedOctober 5, 2007

DocketNo. 2007-CC-1294

StatusPublished

Cited by6 cases

This text of 964 So. 2d 375 (Carter v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Carter v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., 964 So. 2d 375, 2007 La. LEXIS 2221 (La. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

In re Imperial Fire and Casualty Insurance Company; — Defendant; Applying for [376]*376Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of E. Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court Div. O, No. 548002; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2007 CW 0583.

Granted. The judgment of the trial court is reversed and Imperial’s motion for summary judgment is granted for the reasons assigned by the dissenting judge in the court of appeal. We also note this case is factually distinguishable from Duncan v. USAA Ins. Co., 06-0363 (La.11/29/06), 950 So.2d 544, because the Commissioner of Insurance’s regulations specifically allow omission of the policy number if it does not exist at the time UM waiver form is completed.

KNOLL, J., would deny.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Imperial Fire and Casualty Insurance Company; — Defendant; Applying for [376]*376Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of E. Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court Div. O, No. 548002; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2007 CW 0583.

Granted. The judgment of the trial court is reversed and Imperial’s motion for summary judgment is granted for the reasons assigned by the dissenting judge in the court of appeal. We also note this case is factually distinguishable from Duncan v. USAA Ins. Co., 06-0363 (La.11/29/06), 950 So.2d 544, because the Commissioner of Insurance’s regulations specifically allow omission of the policy number if it does not exist at the time UM waiver form is completed.

KNOLL, J., would deny.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

964 So. 2d 375, 2007 La. LEXIS 2221, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carter-v-state-farm-mutual-automobile-insurance-co-la-2007.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack