Carter v. Simons
This text of 12 Ind. 476 (Carter v. Simons) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Suit to foreclose a mortgage. The mortgage was to secure the payment of two notes, due at different times. The first note was due; the second, by ap[477]*477pearance, was not; but the Court found there was a mistake in it, and that it was due. The evidence is not of record. Judgment by default, in proper form, in such cases, for the payment of the whole debt, or a sale of the property.
Subsequently, the defendant appeared, and moved to set aside the default, and grant a trial, simply on the ground that the judgment rendered was erroneous. The Court denied the motion. The judgment was not erroneous. Hunt v. Harding, 11 Ind. R. 245.—Allen v. Parker, id. 504.
~ The judgment is affirmed with 5 per cent, damages and costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
12 Ind. 476, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carter-v-simons-ind-1859.