Carter v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Carter v. Secretary of Health and Human Services. Read the opinion of the Court — 132 Fed. Cl. 372
United States Court of Federal Claims·Decided October 3, 2016·No. 15-1030·Unpublished

Opinion

In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS ************************* TANYA LYNN CARTER, as parent and * legal representative of the estate of her son, * No. 15-1030 Z.J.C., deceased, * Special Master Christian J. Moran * Petitioner, * Filed: September 7, 2016 * v. * * SECRETARY OF HEALTH * AND HUMAN SERVICES, * * Respondent. * ************************* ORDER CONCLUDING PROCEEDINGS1

On September 6, 2016, the petitioner filed a Joint Stipulation of Dismissal in the above- captioned case.

Accordingly, pursuant to Vaccine Rule 21(a), the above-captioned case is hereby dismissed without prejudice. The Clerk of the Court is hereby instructed that a judgment shall not enter in the instant case pursuant to Vaccine Rule 21(a).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/ Christian J. Moran Christian J. Moran Special Master

1 The E-Government Act, 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services), requires that the Court post this decision on its website. Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 18(b), the parties have 14 days to file a motion proposing redaction of medical information or other information described in 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-12(d)(4). Any redactions ordered by the special master will appear in the document posted on the website.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Carter v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, (uscfc 2016).

Carter v. Secretary of Health and Human Services (Carter v. Secretary of Health and Human Services) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 300aa-12
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-12(d)(4)
Purposes
44 U.S.C. § 3501
§ 300a
42 U.S.C. § 300a