Carter v. Rawls

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Carter v. Rawls

260 So. 2d 144, 1972 La. App. LEXIS 5773

CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal

DecidedMarch 28, 1972

DocketNo. 11809

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 260 So. 2d 144 (Carter v. Rawls) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Carter v. Rawls, 260 So. 2d 144, 1972 La. App. LEXIS 5773 (La. Ct. App. 1972).

Pincite

Opinion

HALL, Judge.

This is a companion suit to that of Ryan v. Rawls decided this day. 260 So.2d 137 (La.App. 2d Cir. 1972).

It was stipulated that the property damage to plaintiff’s school bus caused by the accident amounted to $605.32.

For the reasons assigned in our opinion in the companion suit, the judgment of the district court rejecting plaintiff’s demands is reversed and it is hereby ordered, adjudged and decreed, that there be judgment in favor of plaintiff, Clyde A. Carter, and against defendant, John Q. Rawls, in the full sum of $605.32, together with legal interest thereon from date of judicial demand until paid. The judgment of the district court rejecting the third party demand of John Q. Rawls against The Travelers Insurance Company is affirmed. Defendant-appellant, John Q. Rawls, is assessed with all costs of these proceedings.

Affirmed m part, reversed in part and rendered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

HALL, Judge.

This is a companion suit to that of Ryan v. Rawls decided this day. 260 So.2d 137 (La.App. 2d Cir. 1972).

It was stipulated that the property damage to plaintiff’s school bus caused by the accident amounted to $605.32.

For the reasons assigned in our opinion in the companion suit, the judgment of the district court rejecting plaintiff’s demands is reversed and it is hereby ordered, adjudged and decreed, that there be judgment in favor of plaintiff, Clyde A. Carter, and against defendant, John Q. Rawls, in the full sum of $605.32, together with legal interest thereon from date of judicial demand until paid. The judgment of the district court rejecting the third party demand of John Q. Rawls against The Travelers Insurance Company is affirmed. Defendant-appellant, John Q. Rawls, is assessed with all costs of these proceedings.

Affirmed m part, reversed in part and rendered.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

260 So. 2d 144, 1972 La. App. LEXIS 5773, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carter-v-rawls-lactapp-1972.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack