Carter v. Ramsey

169 So. 483, 124 Fla. 790, 1936 Fla. LEXIS 1197
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided July 13, 1936·Published

Opinions

In this Mr. Chief Justice WHITFIELD, Mr. Justice BROWN and Mr. Justice DAVIS are of the opinion that the judgment of the Circuit Court should be reversed, while Mr. Presiding Justice ELLIS, Mr. Justice TERRELL and Mr. Justice BUFORD are of the opinion that the judgment of the Circuit Court should be affirmed. When the members of the Supreme Court, sitting six members in a body and after full consultation, it appears that the members of the Court are permanently and equally divided in opinion as to whether the judgment should be affirmed or reversed, and there is no prospect of an immediate change in the personnel of the Court, the decree should be affirmed; therefore it is considered, ordered and adjudged under the authority of State, ex rel. Hampton, v. McClung, 47 Fla. 224, 37 So. Rep. 51, that the judgment of the Circuit Court in this cause be and the same is hereby affirmed.

Affirmed.

WHITFIELD, C.J., and ELLIS, TERRELL, BROWN, BUFORD and DAVIS, J.J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Carter v. Ramsey, 169 So. 483, 124 Fla. 790, 1936 Fla. LEXIS 1197 (Fla. 1936).

169 So. 483 (Carter v. Ramsey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Mitchell v. Stoutamire
152 So. 629 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1934)
State Ex Rel. Jos. Peck v. Chase
107 So. 541 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1926)
State Ex Rel. Florio v. McGreary
165 So. 904 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1936)
Chase v. State Ex Rel. Burch
113 So. 103 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1927)
Fortenberry v. State
113 So. 193 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1927)
State ex rel. Hampton v. McClung
47 Fla. 224 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1904)
Griffith v. Alcocke
37 So. 47 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1904)