Carter v. Producers & Refiners Oil Co.

30 A. 391, 164 Pa. 463, 1894 Pa. LEXIS 1102
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided October 22, 1894·No. Appeal, No. 82·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The only subjects of complaint in this case are, granting the preliminary injunction, and afterwards continuing the same “ until further order of court.”

The very able and ingenious arguments of the learned counsel for appellants on the questions presented by the record, followed by a careful consideration of those questions, have failed to convince us that there has, been, thus far, any error that calls for our intervention.

In the class of cases to which this belongs, we purposely abstain from any extended comment on the merits of the case, for the reason that, in its subsequent- development, as it progresses to final decree in the court below, some of the questions that may now appear to have an important bearing on the final result may be eliminated, and others may arise.

The decree continuing the preliminary injunction is affirmed and the appeal dismissed with costs to be paid by appellants.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Carter v. Producers & Refiners Oil Co., 30 A. 391, 164 Pa. 463, 1894 Pa. LEXIS 1102 (Pa. 1894).

30 A. 391 (Carter v. Producers & Refiners Oil Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Boyd v. Cooper
410 A.2d 860 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1979)
Goldstein v. Groesbeck
142 F.2d 422 (Second Circuit, 1944)