Carter v. Page Belting Co.

23 A. 621, 65 N.H. 671
CourtSupreme Court of New Hampshire
DecidedDecember 5, 1889
StatusPublished

This text of 23 A. 621 (Carter v. Page Belting Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Carter v. Page Belting Co., 23 A. 621, 65 N.H. 671 (N.H. 1889).

Opinion

Smith, J.

The only question submitted to the jury was, whether Carter knew, or by ordinary care might have known, the danger attending his work in and about the drum in the condition in which it was at the time of the explosion. Whether he had been sufficiently instructed as to the dangerous character of the work, or not instructed at all, was not a question submitted to them,-and there was no request to have it submitted, and no exception that it was not. If the inquiry by the jury was relevant to the question submitted, the reply was according to the facts as they appear from the evidence. There is nothing to show that it was not literally and strictly correct.

Exceptions overruled.

Carpenter, J., did not sit: the others concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
23 A. 621, 65 N.H. 671, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carter-v-page-belting-co-nh-1889.