Carter v. Mitchell
This text of Carter v. Mitchell (Carter v. Mitchell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-6705
CHARLES RAY CARTER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
JOE MITCHELL, Sheriff of the York County Sheriff’s Department; JAMES TEDDY, Lieutenant; BILLY DONAHUE, Correctional Officer; R. HILL, Correctional Officer,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. Henry M. Herlong, Jr, District Judge. (CA-95-2898-6-20)
Submitted: August 20, 2004 Decided: August 27, 2004
Before WILLIAMS, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Charles Ray Carter, Appellant Pro Se. Ronald Keith Wray, II, GALLIVAN, WHITE & BOYD, PA, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Charles Ray Carter appeals the district court’s order
denying Carter’s motion to reopen this action, in which a jury
verdict was returned in 1996. Our review of the record discloses
no abuse of discretion. Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Carter v. Mitchell, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carter-v-mitchell-ca4-2004.