Carter v. McCreary Modern, Inc.
This text of 468 F. App'x 219 (Carter v. McCreary Modern, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Cheryl B. Carter appeals from the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of McCreary Modern, Inc., in her action in which she alleged that McCreary regarded her as disabled and employed improper qualifications stan[220]*220dards in denying her employment. We have reviewed the record on appeal and the briefs filed by the parties and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Carter v. McCreary Modern, Inc., No. 5:10-cv-00014-RLV-DSC, 2011 WL 3444090 (W.D.N.C. Aug. 8, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
468 F. App'x 219, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carter-v-mccreary-modern-inc-ca4-2012.