Carter v. Mason
This text of 1 Ky. Op. 399 (Carter v. Mason) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion of the Court by
We perceive no elror to the infant’s prejudice, and both he and his guardian seem content.
In resting, as the appellant did, on the sale of the infant’s undivided fourth in the town house and lot, she has no right to complain that the Circuit Court so decreed.
Nor has Wilson any available ground for his cross-appeal. As he was a party defendant presumed to be in court, he had constructive notice of the amended petition, and, moreover, had he answered the amendment, this court can neither know nor presume that he would have urged a sale of the entire property of all the joint owners.
Wherefore, the judgment is affirmed on both the original and the cross-appeal.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1 Ky. Op. 399, 1866 Ky. LEXIS 353, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carter-v-mason-kyctapp-1866.