Carter v. Mason

1 Ky. Op. 399, 1866 Ky. LEXIS 353
CourtCourt of Appeals of Kentucky
DecidedOctober 3, 1866
StatusPublished

This text of 1 Ky. Op. 399 (Carter v. Mason) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Carter v. Mason, 1 Ky. Op. 399, 1866 Ky. LEXIS 353 (Ky. Ct. App. 1866).

Opinion

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Robertson:

We perceive no elror to the infant’s prejudice, and both he and his guardian seem content.

In resting, as the appellant did, on the sale of the infant’s undivided fourth in the town house and lot, she has no right to complain that the Circuit Court so decreed.

Nor has Wilson any available ground for his cross-appeal. As he was a party defendant presumed to be in court, he had constructive notice of the amended petition, and, moreover, had he answered the amendment, this court can neither know nor presume that he would have urged a sale of the entire property of all the joint owners.

Wherefore, the judgment is affirmed on both the original and the cross-appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Ky. Op. 399, 1866 Ky. LEXIS 353, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carter-v-mason-kyctapp-1866.