Carter v. Levy

156 So. 2d 119, 1963 La. App. LEXIS 1906
CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal
DecidedJuly 1, 1963
DocketNo. 6009
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 156 So. 2d 119 (Carter v. Levy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Carter v. Levy, 156 So. 2d 119, 1963 La. App. LEXIS 1906 (La. Ct. App. 1963).

Opinion

HERGET, Judge.

On May 9, 1963 Mildred S. Carter, plaintiff-appellee, filed a motion to dismiss the suspensive appeal of Fred Levy, defendant-appellant, on the ground appellant failed to timely file the appeal bond or pay the costs due within the period established by statute.

On May 1, 1963, the return date fixed for the appeal, Fred Levy, appellant, paid the costs and executed an appeal bond depositing in cash sufficient funds to cover same with the Clerk of the Nineteenth Judicial District Court. On the same date, May 1, 1963, appellant lodged with the Clerk of this Court the record and appeal.

Article 2161 of the LSA-Code of Civil Procedure provides:

“An appeal shall not be dismissed because of any irregularity, error, or defect unless it is imputable to the appellant. Except as provided in Article 2162, a motion to dismiss an appeal because of any irregularity, error, or defect which is imputable to the appellant must be filed within three days, exclusive of holidays, of the return day or the date on which the record on appeal is lodged in the appellate court, whichever is later.”

We note the matter complained of is not jurisdictional, nor does it pertain to the other exceptions provided in LSA-C.C.P. Art. 2162.

The appeal herein was lodged on May 1, 1963 and the motion to dismiss the appeal was filed on May 9, 1963. Appellee herein did not file her objection to appellant’s appeal within three legal days of the date on [120]*120which the record was lodged. Therefore, we have no right to consider appellee’s contentions regarding the timeliness of the suspensive appeal bond. Guillory v. Reimers-Schneider Company, La.App., 94 So.2d 134, 135; De Bautte v. Weil Bros. Co., (1915) 12 Orleans App. 107.

Motion to dismiss denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gautreau v. Modern Finance Co. of Gonzales
358 So. 2d 980 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1978)
Home Insurance Co. v. Southern Specialty Sales Co.
222 So. 2d 649 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1969)
Britt v. Brocato
170 So. 2d 516 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1965)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
156 So. 2d 119, 1963 La. App. LEXIS 1906, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carter-v-levy-lactapp-1963.