Carter v. Leith

116 S.E. 125, 29 Ga. App. 499, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 94
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedFebruary 9, 1923
Docket13694
StatusPublished

This text of 116 S.E. 125 (Carter v. Leith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Carter v. Leith, 116 S.E. 125, 29 Ga. App. 499, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 94 (Ga. Ct. App. 1923).

Opinion

Bell, J.

This was an action for slander, in which it was alleged that the slanderous statements were made by one of the defendants in pursuance and execution of a conspiracy between her and the other defendant. The verdict in favor of the plaintiff was not without some evidence to support it. It is not complained that any error of law was committed during the trial, and the judge did not err in overruling the motion of the defendants for a new trial based solely upon the general grounds. See Gilstrap v. Leith, 24 Ga. App. 720 (102 S. E. 169), in which the case was formerly before this court.

Judgment affirmed.

Jenkins, P. J., and Stephens, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gilstrap v. Leith
24 Ga. App. 720 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1920)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
116 S.E. 125, 29 Ga. App. 499, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 94, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carter-v-leith-gactapp-1923.