Carter v. Lanham

Fourth Circuit

Carter v. Lanham

6 F. App'x 200

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 29, 2001·No. No. 00-7648·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

James T. Carter appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp.2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinions and orders and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Carter v. Lanham, No. CA-99-2543-L (D.Md. filed Oct. 13, 2000; entered Oct. 16, 2000; filed Feb. 8, 2000; entered Feb. 9, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

James T. Carter appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp.2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinions and orders and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Carter v. Lanham, No. CA-99-2543-L (D.Md. filed Oct. 13, 2000; entered Oct. 16, 2000; filed Feb. 8, 2000; entered Feb. 9, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Carter v. Lanham, 6 F. App'x 200 (4th Cir. 2001).

Pincite

6 F. App'x 200 (Carter v. Lanham) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related