Carter v. Johnson
This text of 37 S.E. 736 (Carter v. Johnson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. Since sustaining a demurrer to an affidavit of illegality would leave nothing to be tried, it is manifest that the overruling of such a demurrer can not properly be made a ground of a motion for a new trial. See, in this connection, Willbanks v. Untriner, 98 Ga. 861; Holleman v. Bradley Co., 106 Ga. 157; Cleveland v. State, 109 Ga. 265.
2. A direct assignment of error upon a ruling made during the progress of a trial comes too late if for the first time presented in a bill of exceptions sued out more than thirty days after the adjournment of the term at which such ruling was made. Civil Code, § 5539; Dietz v. Fahy, 107 Ga. 325, and cases cited.
3. The evidence warranted a finding in favor of the prevailing party, and there was no abuse of discretion in denying a new trial.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
37 S.E. 736, 112 Ga. 494, 1900 Ga. LEXIS 215, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carter-v-johnson-ga-1900.