Carter v. Jarvis

New York Supreme Court

Carter v. Jarvis

9 Johns. 143

CourtNew York Supreme Court

DecidedMay 15, 1812

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 9 Johns. 143 (Carter v. Jarvis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Carter v. Jarvis, 9 Johns. 143 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1812).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This judgment must be reversed. The wheat growing on the ground, had been sold, and transferred by the plaintiff to Rodgers. The assignment is not set out at length, in the return; but it was treated as an instrument duly transferring all the interest of the plaintiff to Rodgers; and in the declaration the injury is alleged to be done to Rodgers, as assignee of the plaintiff. There was no necessity for bringing the suit in the name of Jarvis; and he having devested himself of all interest in the subject could not, for his own benefit, sustain the action.

Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This judgment must be reversed. The wheat growing on the ground, had been sold, and transferred by the plaintiff to Rodgers. The assignment is not set out at length, in the return; but it was treated as an instrument duly transferring all the interest of the plaintiff to Rodgers; and in the declaration the injury is alleged to be done to Rodgers, as assignee of the plaintiff. There was no necessity for bringing the suit in the name of Jarvis; and he having devested himself of all interest in the subject could not, for his own benefit, sustain the action.

Judgment reversed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

9 Johns. 143, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carter-v-jarvis-nysupct-1812.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack