Carter v. Honolulu Police Department

CourtHawaii Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 15, 2025
DocketSCWC-24-0000540
StatusPublished

This text of Carter v. Honolulu Police Department (Carter v. Honolulu Police Department) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Carter v. Honolulu Police Department, (haw 2025).

Opinion

Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-XX-XXXXXXX 15-JUL-2025 09:39 AM Dkt. 15 ODAC

SCWC-XX-XXXXXXX

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAIʻI _______________________________________________________________ SAMUEL CARTER, Petitioner/Plaintiff-Appellant,

vs.

HONOLULU POLICE DEPARTMENT, CITY & COUNTY OF HONOLULU; CHIEF OF POLICE; WINSTON HALE; JUSTIN GONSALVES; JORDAN REGO; KENRIC PAI; and FLORAND BLANCO, Respondents/Defendants-Appellees. _______________________________________________________________ CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX; CASE NO. 1CCV-XX-XXXXXXX) ORDER REJECTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., McKenna, Eddins, and Ginoza, JJ., and Circuit Judge Ashford, in place of Devens, J., recused)

Petitioner/Plaintiff-Appellant Samuel Carter’s

(Carter) application for writ of certiorari, filed on June 12,

2025, and as supplemented on July 10, 2025, is hereby rejected.

To be clear, Carter has two appeals from the same

circuit court case, CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX and CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX, because

two notices of appeal were mailed to the Circuit Court of the

First Circuit. But each appeal is on a different procedural path because both appeals were not consolidated prior to

dismissal of CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX.

For example, Carter filed an opening brief and

jurisdiction statement in CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX. An opening brief and

jurisdiction statement were not filed in CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX.

This order and the dismissal of CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX does

not affect the outcome of CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX because CAAP-24-

0000540 and CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX were not consolidated prior to the

dismissal of CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX. CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX continued to be

pending in the Intermediate Court of Appeals (ICA) when Carter’s

application for writ of certiorari was filed in this case.

Carter is directed to file documents in CAAP-24-

0000495 while that case continues to be pending in the ICA.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawaiʻi, July 15, 2025.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Todd W. Eddins

/s/ Lisa M. Ginoza

/s/ James H. Ashford

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Carter v. Honolulu Police Department, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carter-v-honolulu-police-department-haw-2025.