Carter v. Harrah's Casino

Missouri Court of Appeals

Carter v. Harrah's Casino

348 S.W.3d 117, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1174, 2011 WL 4025240

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 13, 2011·No. WD 73487·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Order

PER CURIAM:

Janet Carter appeals from the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission’s Final Award affirming the Administrative Law Judge’s denial of her claim for temporary total disability and permanent total disability benefits for an injury she sustained to her thoracic spine on May 12, 2003, while working as a card dealer for Harrah’s Casino. Because the Final Award was supported by competent and substantial evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence, we affirm in this per curiam order and have provided the parties a legal memorandum explaining our ruling. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order

PER CURIAM:

Janet Carter appeals from the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission’s Final Award affirming the Administrative Law Judge’s denial of her claim for temporary total disability and permanent total disability benefits for an injury she sustained to her thoracic spine on May 12, 2003, while working as a card dealer for Harrah’s Casino. Because the Final Award was supported by competent and substantial evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence, we affirm in this per curiam order and have provided the parties a legal memorandum explaining our ruling. Rule 84.16(b).

Carter v. Harrah's Casino, 348 S.W.3d 117, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1174, 2011 WL 4025240 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

348 S.W.3d 117 (Carter v. Harrah's Casino) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related