Carter v. Dunson
38 S.E. 830, 113 Ga. 374, 1901 Ga. LEXIS 270
Opinion
The ruling complained of being one granting a first new trial, and it not appearing that the law and the facts demanded a finding in favor of the prevailing party, the judgment will be affirmed, notwithstanding the grant of the new trial seems to have been based upon a single ground in the motion, and without regard to whether or not this ground was well taken. Carolee v. Handelis, 103 Ga. 302 ; Weinkle v. Railroad, 107 Ga. 367, and cases cited.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Carter v. Dunson, 38 S.E. 830, 113 Ga. 374, 1901 Ga. LEXIS 270 (Ga. 1901).
38 S.E. 830 (Carter v. Dunson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Cox v. Grady
64 S.E. 262 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1909)
Macon Consolidated Street Railroad v. Jones
42 S.E. 468 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1902)
Thornton v. Travelers Insurance
42 S.E. 287 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1902)