Carter v. D'Ambra

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Carter v. D'Ambra

388 A.2d 1377, 120 R.I. 994, 1978 R.I. LEXIS 878

CourtSupreme Court of Rhode Island

DecidedJune 29, 1978

DocketM. P. No. 78-332

StatusPublished

This text of 388 A.2d 1377 (Carter v. D'Ambra) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Rhode Island primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Carter v. D'Ambra, 388 A.2d 1377, 120 R.I. 994, 1978 R.I. LEXIS 878 (R.I. 1978).

Pincite

Opinion

The respondent is a member of the Bar of this state. On June 22, 1978, we issued an order directing him to appear before this court on Thursday, June 29, 1978 to show cause why he should not be disciplined pursuant to the provisions of Rule 42(6) (e) for his failure to respond to a complaint filed with this court’s Disciplinary Board in November, 1977. Respondent did not appear on that date.

Accordingly, it is ordered that Joseph R. D’Ambra is hereby reprimanded for indulging in the practices described herein, and he is to forthwith file a response in which he will set forth the facts that will assist the Board and its counsel in discharging their duties under the rules. Failure on the respondent’s part to file the response will result in an order being entered, without any further notice, indefinitely suspending him from the practice of law.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The respondent is a member of the Bar of this state. On June 22, 1978, we issued an order directing him to appear before this court on Thursday, June 29, 1978 to show cause why he should not be disciplined pursuant to the provisions of Rule 42(6) (e) for his failure to respond to a complaint filed with this court’s Disciplinary Board in November, 1977. Respondent did not appear on that date.

Accordingly, it is ordered that Joseph R. D’Ambra is hereby reprimanded for indulging in the practices described herein, and he is to forthwith file a response in which he will set forth the facts that will assist the Board and its counsel in discharging their duties under the rules. Failure on the respondent’s part to file the response will result in an order being entered, without any further notice, indefinitely suspending him from the practice of law.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

388 A.2d 1377, 120 R.I. 994, 1978 R.I. LEXIS 878, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carter-v-dambra-ri-1978.