Carter v. Continental Cas. Co.

978 So. 2d 247, 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 4819, 2008 WL 895802
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 4, 2008
Docket5D07-1653
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 978 So. 2d 247 (Carter v. Continental Cas. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Carter v. Continental Cas. Co., 978 So. 2d 247, 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 4819, 2008 WL 895802 (Fla. Ct. App. 2008).

Opinion

978 So.2d 247 (2008)

Theodore CARTER, Appellant,
v.
CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY, Appellee.

No. 5D07-1653.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

April 4, 2008.

*248 Andrew G. Natelson, Flagler Beach, for Appellant.

DeWitte Thompson of Thompson, Slagle & Hannan, LLC, Duluth, GA, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Theodore Carter timely appeals from a final summary judgment entered against him and in favor of Continental Casualty Company, finding him liable to Continental under two indemnity agreements and a "funds receipt and disbursement agreement" that he allegedly signed to secure the performance of a construction company. At the time of the summary judgment hearing, Carter's deposition had been taken and filed with the court. In the deposition, Carter denied signing both indemnity agreements and claimed that although the signature on the funds receipt and disbursement agreement appeared to be his, he did not sign it and had never before seen it. Because Carter's deposition testimony creates a genuine issue of material fact as to whether the signatures on the relevant documents were his or not, the trial court erred in entering summary judgment in Continental's favor. See Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.510(c); Petruska v. Smartparks-Silver Springs, Inc., 914 So.2d 502, 504 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005).

Therefore, we reverse the judgment against Carter, and remand for further proceedings in this matter.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

ORFINGER, TORPY and LAWSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Liudmila Golubtsova v. Vladimir Budaev
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2025

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
978 So. 2d 247, 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 4819, 2008 WL 895802, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carter-v-continental-cas-co-fladistctapp-2008.