Carter v. Comm'r
This text of 2003 T.C. Memo. 235 (Carter v. Comm'r) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Tax Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
*234 Decision was entered for petitioner as to 1986, 1987, and 1988 taxable years and for respondent as to 1989 taxable year.
MEMORANDUM FINDINGS OF FACT AND OPINION
FOLEY, Judge: The issue for decision is whether petitioner is liable for deficiencies, additions to tax for fraud, and a fraud penalty.
FINDINGS OF FACT
Petitioner filed his 1986 and 1987 income tax returns on March 10, 1989, 1988 return on October 20, 1989, and 1989 return sometime after August 15, 1990. On September 30, 1997, respondent determined deficiencies relating to 1986 through 1989; additions to tax for fraud, pursuant to
From 1984 through 1990, *235 petitioner worked for Stuart-James Company, Inc. (Stuart-James) in Tampa, Florida. Petitioner started as an assistant manager, was then promoted to manager, and from 1985 through 1990 was regional vice president responsible for 14 branch offices and approximately 300 sales representatives. Because of his significant management responsibilities and demanding travel schedule, petitioner relied heavily on staff to manage his affairs. In the late 1980s, he hired Francis Pisano, a certified public accountant and tax attorney, and Kristine Grace DeFillippis, a secretary. Petitioner agreed to pay 3 percent of his income to Mr. Pisano. In exchange, Mr. Pisano was responsible for managing petitioner's business and personal financial matters and preparing petitioner's 1986 through 1989 returns. Ms. DeFillippis managed petitioner's administrative (e.g., reimbursement of petitioner's travel expenses) and personal matters (e.g., she corresponded with Mr. Pisano regarding the filing of petitioner's 1986 through 1989 returns and gave Mr. Pisano copies of petitioner's reimbursement expense checks relating to 1988 and 1989).
In the mid-1980s, petitioner established and funded an account in the name*236 of his friend, Gina M. Oliva (Oliva account). Petitioner used this account to purchase and sell Stuart-James' initial public offerings. These trades were against company policy and in 1986 and 1987 produced capital gain income of $ 15,315 and $ 136, respectively. Petitioner did not disclose the Oliva account to Mr. Pisano or report the capital gain income on his 1986 and 1987 returns.
Petitioner, on the Schedule C, Profit or Loss From Business, accompanying his 1986, 1987, 1988, and 1989 returns, deducted total travel and entertainment expenses of $ 33,963, $ 79,726, $ 95,798, and $ 64,494, respectively. These returns did not reflect $ 153,711 of travel and expense reimbursements received from Stuart- James from 1986 through 1989. In 1989, petitioner received, but did not report on his 1989 return, a pension distribution of $ 105,341.
In 1995, petitioner was indicted for tax evasion, pursuant to
Petitioner, while residing in Tampa, Florida, timely filed a petition on January 2, 1998.
*237 OPINION
On September 30, 1997, respondent determined petitioner's tax liability relating to 1986, 1987, 1988, and 1989. Petitioner concedes that he underpaid his 1986 through 1989 taxes, but contends that the liabilities were determined after the 3-year period of limitations set forth in
Respondent did not establish by clear and convincing evidence that petitioner was liable for fraud. 2
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2003 T.C. Memo. 235, 86 T.C.M. 229, 2003 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 234, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carter-v-commr-tax-2003.